{"id":1089,"date":"2020-05-08T14:33:55","date_gmt":"2020-05-08T12:33:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/?p=1089"},"modified":"2020-10-27T00:11:43","modified_gmt":"2020-10-26T23:11:43","slug":"comparison-of-bacterial-communities-of-activated-sludge-and-membrane-biofilm-of-mbrs-treating-landfill-leachates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/?p=1089","title":{"rendered":"Comparison of bacterial communities of activated sludge and membrane biofilm of MBRs treating landfill leachates."},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction.<\/span><\/h4>\n

In this paper, bacterial communities of the mixed liquor (ML) from two full-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) with external membrane configuration (side-stream MBRs), treating effluents of two organic fractions from municipal solid wastes (OFMSW) have been evaluated. Both plants consist of anaerobic digestion plus composting processes. However, in one plant (MBR-HS) anaerobic digestion is carried out with a solid concentration higher than 15% (so-called Dry-process) and, in the other one (MBR-LS), the process is carried out with solids at a concentration lower than 10% (Wet-process). Comparison is carried out in order to find out the differences in the MBR mixed liquors caused by the different type of process carried out in the OFMSW and their influence on membrane fouling bacterial community development.<\/span><\/p>\n

Conclusions.<\/span><\/h4>\n

MBR mixed liquors caused by the different type of process carried out in the OFMSW affected the biofilm bacterial community structure.<\/span><\/p>\n

References.<\/span><\/h4>\n

Zuriaga-Agust\u00ed E., Mendoza-Roca J., Bes-Pi\u00e1 A., Alonso Molina J. L., Mu\u00f1agorri-Ma\u00f1ueco F., Ortiz-Villalobos G., Fern\u00e1ndez-Gim\u00e9nez E., Comparison between mixed liquors of two side-stream membrane bioreactors tretaing wastewaters from waste management plants with high and low solids anaerobic digestion, Water Res. 100 (2016) 517-525.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"P\u00f3ster<\/p>\n

Descarga del P\u00f3ster Aqu\u00ed<\/strong> <\/a>y enlace a ResearchGate<\/strong><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Jos\u00e9 Luis Alonso (1)<\/sup>, Juli\u00e1n Fern\u00e1ndez-Navarro (1)<\/sup>, Laura Moreno-Mesonero (1)<\/sup>, Elena Zuriaga-Agust\u00ed (2)<\/sup>, Jos\u00e9 Antonio Mendoza-Roca (2)<\/sup>, Yolanda Moreno (1)<\/sup>, Cristina Alv\u00e1rez (3)<\/sup>.<\/span>
\n(1)<\/sup> Instituto de Ingenier\u00eda del Agua y Medio Ambiente. Universitat Polit\u00e8cnica de Val\u00e8ncia.<\/span>
\n(2)<\/sup> Instituto de Seguridad Industrial, Radiof\u00edsica y Medioambiental. Universitat Polit\u00e8cnica de Val\u00e8ncia.<\/span>
\n(3)<\/sup> URBASER.<\/span><\/p>\n

Alonso-Molina, J. Fern\u00e1ndez-Navarro, Juli\u00e1n. Moreno-Mesonero, Laura. Zuriaga, Elena. Mendoza-Roca, J. Moreno, Yolanda. Alvarez-Requena, C. 2019. Comparison of bacterial communities of activated sludge and membrane biofilm of MBRs treating landfill leachates. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13140\/RG.2.2.18950.22081<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Introduction. In this paper, bacterial communities of the mixed liquor (ML) from two full-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) with external membrane configuration (side-stream MBRs), treating effluents of two organic fractions from municipal solid wastes (OFMSW) have been evaluated. Both plants consist of anaerobic digestion plus composting processes. However, in one plant […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1089","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articulos","category-investigacion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1089","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1089"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1089\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1095,"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1089\/revisions\/1095"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1089"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1089"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fqedar.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1089"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}